Programme
| Thursday, 24th June | |
| 07:00 |
Welcome Address
Main Arena
|
| 07:10 |
Session 1: Future trends in Management of Ischaemic Stroke
Has the supremacy of Endarterectomy finally been proven? |
| Level One Evidence: Are Rcts Applicable To Contemporary Carotid Practice? | |
| 07:10 |
Carotid Revascularisation Endarterectomyversus Stenting Trial (CREST)
|
| 07:15 |
Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS) and the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS)
|
| 07:20 |
Latest Results form the ASCTII Trial
|
| 07:25 |
How to interpret the CAS versus - CEA results, an updated metanalysis
|
| Debate 1: | |
| 07:30 |
CAS offers longterm benefit and restenosis rates which are comparable to CEA
|
| 07:35 |
CAS is plagued with short term risks in the absence of proven long term benefit: It is not worth the risk
|
| 07:40 | -- Audience Vote -- |
| Debate 2: | |
| 07:42 |
Carotid Endarterectomy provides life-long stroke protection in "high-risk" medical patients
|
| 07:47 |
Is CEA financially viable in patients at high medical risk? Do they live to experience the benefits
|
| 07:52 | -- Audience Vote -- |
| Debate 3: | |
| 07:54 |
CEA is the procedure of choice for Stroke in evolution. Treatment by CAS is akin to playing Russian Roulette
|
| 08:01 |
CAS is safe and should be the treatment of choice when urgent carotid revascularisation is needed
|
| 08:06 | -- Audience Vote -- |
| Debate 4: | |
| 08:08 |
Screening for Carotid Artery Disease is a futile endeavor and waste of money. There is no evidence to suggest that CEA or CAS are warranted in asymptomatic patients
|
| 08:13 |
Carotid Screening is warranted: An analysis of the 3.1 million patients screened for carotid disease and a paradigm for deciding who should be screened for carotid stenosis
|
| 08:18 | -- Audience Vote -- |
| 08:20 | -- Panel Sum-up -- |
| Clinical Insight | |
| 08:25 |
Carotid artery stenting for post-carotid endarterectomy restenosis is safer than redo carotid endarterectomy and should be the procedure of choice
|
| A Look To The Future | |
| 08:30 |
Update on the vulnerable carotid plaque. A bioengineering evaluation of real-life patients
|
| 08:35 |
Duplex-assisted internal carotid artery balloon angioplasty and stent placement
|
| 08:55 |
Session 2: Hybrid techniques & Management of Thoracic Aortic Pathology
Level One Evidence, debates and controversies in real-life clinical practice and an introduction uo new techniques and device innovation |
| Level One Evidence | |
| 08:55 |
The dilemma of the Instead trial. One arm monotechnology is not enough.
|
| Debate 1: | |
| 09:00 |
TEVAR is the best option for ruptured TAA
|
| 09:05 |
Open Repair remains the gold standard for ruptured TAA
|
| 09:10 | -- Audience Vote -- |
| Debate 2: | |
| 09:12 |
Contemporary Outcomes of TEVAR: Current Devices are broadly applicable to all pathologies
|
| 09:17 |
Pathological specific devices are essential otherwise we risk doing more harm than good. Unique insight form the European registry on endovascular aortic repair complications (Retrograde ascending aortic dissection during or after thoracic aortic stent graft placement)
|
| 09:22 | -- Audience Vote -- |
| Debate 3: | |
| 09:24 |
Penetrating aortic ulcers (PAU) and intramural hematoma (IMH): New insights and treatment guidelines. Endovascular Repair is not always the best option
|
| 09:29 |
Penetrating aortic ulcers and intramural hematomas: endovascular management is the only course of action
|
| 09:34 | -- Audience Vote -- |
| Debate 4: | |
| 09:36 |
Once dissected always dissected. Stent graft repair is seldom indicated and Medical Therapy is still the best option for chronic type B dissection
|
| 09:41 |
Endovascular intervention has lowered the risk of intervention and is currently the best treatment option for chronic type B dissection
|
| 09:46 | -- Audience Vote -- |
| Debate 5: | |
| 09:48 |
Endovascular technology will overcome current device limitations in type A aortic dissection
|
| 09:53 |
Primary open repair is the best solution for Type A Arotic Dissection. Endografts are doomed to failure for this indication
|
| 09:58 | -- Audience Vote -- |
| 10:00 | -- Panel Sum-up -- |
| 10:05 |
Mapping the aorta: A new look at anatomy in the era of endograft repair
|
| A Look To The Future | |
| 10:10 |
Next Generation Devices for TEVAR. What to expect next.
|
| Tips And Tricks | |
| 10:15 |
Complications and their management after TEVAR
|
| 10:20 |
Tips and Tricks for Percutaneous TEVAR
|
| 10:25 |
Coffee Break
|
| 11:00 |
Session 3: New Insights and On-going Contoversies in AAA Management
An overview of the most recent randomized clinical trials, enthusiastic debates on unresolved issues in everyday clinical, and an insight into current innovation and future directions in abdominal aortic diagnosis and management. |
| Level One Evidence | |
| 11:00 |
Two-year results of the OVER Trial
|
| Debate 1: | |
| 11:05 |
EVAR is the current gold standard for ruptured AAA: Opening a Ruptured AAA is murder! Results of a worldwide registry
|
| 11:10 |
There is no objective evidence to that EVAR improves outcome from rupture AAA. Open repair remains the proven standard of care
|
| 11:15 | -- Audience Vote -- |
| Debate 2: | |
| 11:17 |
Changes In Patient Fitness And EVAR Suitability During Surveillance Of Small AAAs: EVAR availability has lowered the threshold for small AAAs Repair?
|
| 11:22 |
We still has no evidence to suggest that AAAs should be repaired at less than 5.5cm and are justified in withholding treatment while the aneurysm grows
|
| 11:27 |
EVAR for small aneurysms: When to intervene
|
| 11:32 | -- Audience Vote -- |
| Debate 3: | |
| 11:34 |
The EVAR 2 debate was a whole lot of fuss over a very small issue: risk stratification of patients for endovascular AAA repair shows that the high risk group is quite small and helps to identify th
|
| 11:39 |
Para Millennium High Risk AAA saga: A clinical dilemma but is not a major concern for the endovascular specialist!
|
| 11:44 | -- Audience Vote -- |
| Debate 4: | |
| 11:46 |
Bilateral Hypogastric revascularisation is not necessary.
|
| 11:51 |
Bilateral Hypogastric revascularisation is necessary to prevent long term complications and is relatively simple to perform with branched endografts.
|
| 11:56 | -- Audience Vote -- |
| Debate 5: | |
| 11:58 |
Failed Endografts requiring open surgery can be safely left in situ
|
| 12:03 |
Failed Endografts Requiring Open Surgery Mandate Graft Removal
|
| 12:08 | -- Audience Vote -- |
| 12:10 | -- Panel Sum-up -- |
| Current Clinical Standards | |
| 12:15 |
SVS Clinical Practice Guidelines for AAA. Have they taught us something new?
|
| 12:20 |
Are we looking in the wrong place: an analysis of 3.1 million patients screened for AAA with the proposal of a new system for identifying who should be screened for AAA disease
|
| 12:25 |
Different guidelines are needed for men and women with AAA. Unique female behaviour
|
| 12:30 | -- Panel Sum-up -- |
| 12:35 |
The Fascia suture technique as an alternative to classical cut down or closure device after EVAR
|
| A Look To The Future | |
| 12:40 |
Biomechanical Assessment of Rupture Potential for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
|
| 12:45 |
Computer-Aided Assessment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms
|
| 12:50 |
The ever decreasing profile for EVAR: why is profile so important?
|
| 13:00 |
Lunch
|
| 14:00 |
Session 4: Redefining the Gold Standard for limb salvage
Topical debates and innovative insights into current and future management of lower limb arterial occlusive disease |
| Level One Evidence: Does It Live Up To The Real Clinical Test | |
| 14:00 |
The MIMIC trial does not apply to contemporary clinical practice
|
| 14:05 |
Total endovascular bypass: The Gore Viabahn system for long SFA occlusions
|
| Debate 1: | |
| 14:10 |
Bypass is dead: Approaching six sigma perfection in endovascular procedures. Results of over 400 patients
|
| 14:15 |
Bypass still plays a vital role in limb salvage
|
| 14:20 | -- Audience Vote -- |
| Debate 2: | |
| 14:22 |
Femoro-femoral cross-over bypass: a viable option in claudication
|
| 14:27 |
Open surgery is no longer indicated beyond limb salvage. Our catheter skills have outshone our surgical prowess. Claudicants should never be treated with invasive surgery.
|
| 14:32 |
Trials of Peripheral Arterial Occlusive disease need a medical control. Medical therapy is still a viable option
|
| 14:37 | -- Audience Vote -- |
| Debate 3: | |
| 14:39 |
In patients with multi-level occlusive disease it is not necessary to treat tibial arteries if inflow is adequate: Do no harm
|
| 14:44 |
In multi-level occlusive disease the tibial arteries must be revascularised
|
| 14:49 | -- Audience Vote -- |
| Debate 4: | |
| 14:51 |
Tibial angioplasty is superior to bypass surgery
|
| 14:56 |
Tibial angioplasty is still experimental: Bypass surgery remains the gold standard
|
| 15:01 | -- Audience Vote -- |
| Debate 5: | |
| 15:03 |
Multi-layer stents are the preferred option for popliteal aneurysm exclusion
|
| 15:08 |
Hybrid approach for treatment of behind the knee popliteal artery aneurysms
|
| 15:13 |
Bypass surgery is still the preferred option for popliteal aneurysm exclusion
|
| 15:18 | -- Audience Vote -- |
| 15:20 | -- Panel Sum-up -- |
| Current Clinical Standards | |
| 15:25 |
Are our practice guidelines outdated and who needs to be at the table when formulating a contemporary consensus?
|
| Bioengineering Perspectives | |
| 15:30 |
Has the harnessing of spiral laminar flow been advantageous in clinical practice and what are the latest innovative developments in this area?
|
| Trainee Perspectives | |
| 15:35 |
Five Years Prospective study of Duplex Ultrasound Arterial Mapping (DUAM) as a primary modality in management of Critical lower limb ischemia (CLI). Technical and clinical outcome after Bypass Surgery (BS) and Endovascular Revascularisation (EvR)
|
| 15:39 |
Methicillin resistant staphylococcal infections (MRSA) and colonisation rates and their consequences on long term upshots to Vascular patients imparting to a tertiary referral unit : a seven year expe
|
| 15:43 |
Supragenicular bypass using cuffed synthetic grafts in management of critical lower limb ischaemia (CLI): A 4 year observational parallel group prospective comparative study.
|
| 15:47 |
Session 5: Venous Forum
Debates on the current best available treatmetns for venous disorders |
| Venous Disease | |
| Debate 1: | |
| 15:47 |
Endovenous Laser Ablation: Wavelength and Fiber Innovation have ensured the superiority of Laser ablation over radiofrequency techniques
|
| 15:52 |
Radiofrequency Ablation has less procedure related complications and is more effective in the long term than laser techniques
|
| 15:57 |
Thermal ablation is a primitive way of managing superficial vein reflux
|
| 16:02 | -- Audience Vote -- |
| Debate 2: | |
| 16:04 |
Pulmonary embolisation is correlated with location of DVTs. Not all Infraopopliteal DVTs are inert
|
| 16:09 |
Treatment of Infrapopliteal DVTs is an unnecessary waste of resources
|
| 16:14 | -- Audience Vote -- |
| Wound Care Management | |
| 16:16 |
Clinical applications of VAC. What can we learn from Bioengineering
|
| 16:21 |
Systematic Review: Does Topical Negative Pressure really heal wounds?
|
| 16:26 |
Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy is more clinically efficacious and cost effective compared to compression therapy in the treatment of chronic venous ulcers
|
| Future Perspective | |
| 16:31 |
What lies ahead in the science of wound care?
|
| Trainee Perspectives | |
| 16:36 |
Case–control divergence of a Pivotal study of Tinzaparin alone versus Warfarin for treatment of Acute Deep Venous Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism. Early experience, Q-TWIST and paradigm shift in management of DVT in a tertiary referral centre
|
| 16:40 |
To ligate or not to ligate in migrating superficial thrombophlebitits
|
| 16:44 |
Coffee Break
|
| 17:15 |
Session 6: Perspectives from the world of cardiology
The latest developments and on-going controversies in the management of ischaemic and structural heart disease. Can we aplly this treatemtns to the vasculature in general? |
| Structural Heart Disease | |
| 17:15 |
Aortic Valve repair: Transfemoral vs Transapical
|
| 17:20 |
Totally Percutaneous Aortic Valve Insertion
|
| Ischaemic Cardiac Disease | |
| Debate 1: | |
| 17:25 |
Drug-eluting stents are widely applicable the choice of drug is the only differential factor when treating the patient
|
| 17:30 |
ASCERT: The American College of Cardiology Foundation-The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Collaboration on the Comparative Effectiveness of Revascularization Strategies.
|
| 17:35 |
New developments in the preoperative evaluation and perioperative management of coronary artery disease in patients undergoing vascular surgery.
|
| 17:40 |
What happens to the femoral artery with manual compression hemostasis? Do we really know?
|
| 17:45 | -- Audience Vote -- |
| Innovation | |
| 17:47 |
What is the next big thing in cardiac revascularisation?
|
| 17:55 |
What is the next big thing in Electophysiological cardiac disease management?
|
| 18:00 |
First-in-man 1-year clinical outcomes of the Catania Coronary Stent System with Nanothin Polyzene-F in de novo coronary artery lesions
|
| 18:15 |
Session 7: Disruptive Techologies & Innovative Solutions
An introduction to new devices and pipeline technologies from world-leaders in the MedTech Sector |
| What's New Out There? | |
| 18:15 |
The Uniballoon: Cage Moulding Catherter: Engineer
|
| 18:20 |
The Uniballoon: Cage Moulding Catherter: Clinician
|
| 18:25 |
RHEOS Trial. Harnessing the carotid sinus barorecptor effect to treat refractory hypertension: Engineer
|
| 18:30 |
RHEOS Trial. Harnessing the carotid sinus barorecptor effect to treat refractory hypertension: Clinician
|
| 18:35 |
Multilayer stent technology: Engineer
|
| 18:40 |
Branch graft technology: Clinician
|
| 18:45 |
Branch graft technology: Engineer
|
| 18:50 |
Is the optimal topical hemostatic agent available for surgical intervention?
|
| A Different Perspective | |
| 18:55 |
Lessons Learned from conflict. How to save life and limb under the most terrifying of circumstances
|
| 19:20 |
Adjournment Day One
|
| Friday, 25th June | |
| 07:00 |
Session 8: Future Perspectives on Carotid Artery Intervention
Can technology overcome the shortcomings of CAS technology: Debates and unique insights into future innovations. |
| Level One Evidence: Are Rcts Applicable To Contemporary Carotid Practice? | |
| 07:00 |
Carotid Imaging and Surgery in view of the new recent trials and needs for future studies.
|
| Debate 1: | |
| 07:05 |
Filter-protected CAS is more dangerous and associated with more procedure related complications than unfiltered CAS
|
| 07:10 |
Carotid Filters are as necessary as seat-belts and failure to use one puts the patients at enhanced risk of stroke
|
| 07:15 | -- Audience Vote -- |
| Debate 2: | |
| 07:17 |
Transcervical approach for CAS is safer and avoids the multiple pitfalls in the arch
|
| 07:22 |
Transfemoral CAS offers long-term benefit and restenosis rates which are comparable to CEA
|
| 07:27 | -- Audience Vote -- |
| Debate 3: | |
| 07:29 |
Experience is the key is successful CAS
|
| 07:34 |
Experience does not guarantee success for CAS: Lessons learned from RCTs
|
| 07:39 | -- Audience Vote -- |
| Debate 4: | |
| 07:41 |
Plaque echoluceny is the best indicator for procedure success according to protection device and learning curve
|
| 07:46 |
Low GSM is not correlated to stroke risk
|
| 07:51 | -- Audience Vote -- |
| Debate 5: | |
| 07:53 |
Carotid Intervention is superior to best medical treatment in patients with asymptomatic disease and stenosis above 60%
|
| 07:58 |
Effect of exercise and statins on carotid artery stenosis: Intervention is not warranted in asymptomatic patients
|
| 08:03 | -- Audience Vote -- |
| 08:05 | -- Panel Sum-up -- |
| Current Clinical Standards | |
| Debate 6: | |
| 08:10 |
What does the SVS recommend for CEA?
|
| 08:15 |
What does the ESVS recommend for CEA?
|
| 08:20 |
USA v Europe: Who has got it right?
|
| 08:25 | -- Audience Vote -- |
| 08:27 |
Session 9: Trials and Tribulations of Thoracic Technologies
Controveries and future projections among the diverse pathologies of the thoracic aorta. |
| Debate 1: | |
| 08:27 |
The use of chimney and snorkel grafts in the aortic arch are universally applicable and offer a satisfactory solution especially in the emergency setting
|
| 08:32 |
Durability issues with Fenestrated and Chimney Grafts in the aortic arch make these a questionable long-term solution. Branched graft technology will eliminate the need for chimney grafts
|
| 08:37 | -- Audience Vote -- |
| Debate 2: | |
| 08:39 |
The Endovascular Specialist is well-equipped to deal with even the most challenging of aortic arches.
|
| 08:44 |
Hybrid Aortic Repair is a superior option. Endovascular technology is under-developed and will not survive in the long term in this high-pressure environment
|
| 08:49 | -- Audience Vote -- |
| Debate 3: | |
| 08:51 |
Good risk patients are best served by endovascular technology. Device development has overcome limitations to the application of endografts in all pathologies
|
| 08:56 |
Long term durability issues render endografts experimental especially in young and good risk patients: Open repair remains the gold standard
|
| 09:01 | -- Audience Vote -- |
| 09:03 | -- Panel Sum-up -- |
| A Look To The Future | |
| 09:08 |
Progress towards standard off-the-shelf branched components for TAAA and arch repair.
|
| 09:13 |
Multi-layer Stents the new paradigm in TAAA repair
|
| Tips And Tricks | |
| 09:18 |
Aortic arch anomalies are more common than you think: Case examples and treatment strategies
|
| 09:23 |
Early experience with cTAG
|
| 09:28 |
Session 10: Pushing the Envelope with Endovascular Techniques for AAA
Debates on Real-life clinical scenarios, pararenal aortic repair and a insight into current and future innovations |
| Debate 1: | |
| 09:28 |
Hostile neck anatomy in endovascular aortic aneurysm repair is an independent adverse predictor for adverse outcome using modular devices. These aneurysms are best repaired using an open technique
|
| 09:33 |
Pararenal endovascular aortic repair is the superior to open repair and affords the most clinically efficacious and cost-effective outcome
|
| 09:38 | -- Audience Vote -- |
| Debate 2: | |
| 09:40 |
A bifurcated device utilizing anatomical fixation is best equipped to deal with hostile neck anatomy and reduce migration risk. A look at the IntuiTrak System.
|
| 09:45 |
Modular commercially available devices which are specifically built for short and angulated neck are a superior option in this anatomy. A look at the Endurant system
|
| 09:50 | -- Audience Vote -- |
| Debate 3: | |
| 09:52 |
Fenestrated and branched technology is the most clinically efficacious option for endovascular repair of pararenal aortas. They are worth the wait!
|
| 09:57 |
Visceral chimney stenting during EVAR-offer a superior alternative to fenestrated/branched endograft that is more readily available with enhanced cost-effectiveness
|
| 10:02 | -- Audience Vote -- |
| Debate 4: | |
| 10:04 |
Management of mycotic perivisceral aortic pathology with the use of cryopreserved allografts: A superior option in infected territories
|
| 10:09 |
Mycotic perivisceral aortic pathology: There is always the option of endovascular autologous stenting with Palmaz covered vein graft
|
| 10:14 | -- Audience Vote -- |
| 10:16 | -- Panel Sum-up -- |
| A Look To The Future | |
| 10:21 |
Robotically assisted In-situ fenestrated stent grafting
|
| 10:26 |
New stents and new graft materials for TAA and AAA repair.
|
| Tips And Tricks | |
| 10:31 |
Technique For Placement Of Large Palmaz Stent For Proximal Neck Problem During EVAR: What Balloon, Sheath And Precautions Are Needed?
|
| Trainees Perspectives | |
| 10:36 |
Early experience with chimney thoracoabdominal endografts
|
| 10:40 |
Incidence of concomitant malignancy in AAA: 8 year experience
|
| 10:44 |
Long-term follow-up of AAA patients and factors determining sac shrinkage
|
| 10:49 |
Coffee Break
|
| 11:15 |
Session 11: Putting the best foot forward:Optimal Management for PAD
Present and future insights into optimal management of lower limb arterial disease |
| Debate 1: | |
| 11:15 |
Cardiliogists have a lot to teach us about below the knee disease: Experience gained in the heart can be translated to the tibial tree
|
| 11:20 |
Vascular surgeons are more experienced in infragenicular disease and are better equipped to treat these unique vessels
|
| 11:25 | -- Audience Vote -- |
| Debate 2: | |
| 11:27 |
Lyse and Lase to reduce thromboembolic complications during endo-revasculariztion of arterial occlusive disease. Results of over 600 inpatients
|
| 11:32 |
Distal filters are clinically superior and more cost effective in the management of lower limb embolisation.
|
| 11:37 | -- Audience Vote -- |
| Debate 3: | |
| 11:39 |
Subintimal angioplasty is a technical error not a first choice procedure
|
| 11:44 |
Subintimal angioplasty is an invaluable and cost-effective technique in experienced hands
|
| 11:49 | -- Audience Vote -- |
| Debate 4: | |
| 11:51 |
RE-entry devices are a vital component of any interventionalist lower limb armamentarium
|
| 11:59 |
Re-entry devices: add nothing but cost to the management of CTOs
|
| 12:04 | -- Audience Vote -- |
| 12:06 |
It is time to grasp the nettle? Endovascular interventions should be performed by surgeons not Interventional Radiologists
|
| 12:11 |
All that is necessary for Successful revascularisation is a good guide wire and a lowly guiding catheter. New devices are only toys and an unjustified expense
|
| 12:16 |
There is always plan D for Limb Salvage
|
| 12:21 | -- Panel Sum-up -- |
| Imagine This | |
| Debate 5: | |
| 12:26 |
Phase-contrast flow quantification - has doppler ultrasound met its match?
|
| 12:32 |
Doppler ultrasound is an essential, cost-effective and stand alone tool for vascular intervention. Contrast adds unnecessary risk
|
| 12:37 | -- Audience Vote -- |
| Novel Markers To Predict Outcome | |
| 12:39 |
Impaired Glucose control and the use of HbA1c as a predictor of adverse events in vascular patients
|
| 12:44 |
Lunch
|
| 13:30 |
Session 12: Renal Disease: from access to renal artery
Debates on the latest controversies in renal artery revascularisation and management of renal patients requiring dialysis access |
| Renal Artery Disease | |
| Debate 1: | |
| 13:30 |
Percutaneous renal artery stenting is safe even in patients with single functioning Kidneys
|
| 13:35 |
Renal Stenting is Not a Painless Technique: Selective Mistakes in Percutaneous Angioplasty for Arteriosclerotic Renal Artery Stenotic Disease
|
| 13:40 | -- Audience Vote -- |
| Av Access | |
| Debate 2: | |
| 13:42 |
Dialysis catheters are bad news
|
| 13:47 |
Centros(TM) Central Venous Catheter for Dialysis
|
| 13:52 | -- Audience Vote -- |
| Debate 3: | |
| 13:54 |
Primary AV Fistulas are the Gold standard. Synthetic grafts increase the risk of infection and are associated with reduced patency
|
| 13:59 |
Synthetic Grafts simplify the AVF procedure, broaden the scope of suitable patients and have acceptable long term patency: Lessons learned from the Rapidax Clinical Trial. The Case for Synthetic Grafts or When to Break the Rules in Vascular Access Surgery.
|
| 14:04 | -- Audience Vote -- |
| 14:06 |
How can we improve renal access grafts: Will they ever realistically compare to native vessels?
|
| Trainees Perspective | |
| 14:11 |
Primary non-synthetic AVFs: Are proximal AVF access procedures superior to distal access interventions? A 5-Year congruence scrutiny assessment study.
|
| 14:15 |
Session 13: Cardiovascular Anti-ageing & Regenerative Medicine
Introduction to cardiovascular anti-ageing medicine and metabolic cardiovascular disease with cutting-edge debates on stem cell therapies |
| Stem Cell Therapies For Critical Limb Ischaemia | |
| Debate 1: | |
| 14:15 |
Therapeutic potential of endothelial progenitor cells
|
| 14:20 |
Stems cells have not worked to date: Will embryonic stem cells make a difference?
|
| 14:25 | -- Audience Vote -- |
| Cardiovascular Anti-ageing | |
| 14:27 |
Cardiovascular Antiageing: Can we role back the years? YES WE CAN!
|
| 14:32 |
Epigenomics and Vascular Disease
|
| 14:42 |
Nutritional Supplementation for Carotid Artery Disease
|
| 14:47 |
Statin use in patients with diabetes and their role in new onset diabetes
|
| 14:52 |
Optimal approaches to achieving lower LDL-C targets
|
| Trainees Perspective | |
| 14:57 |
Does statin adversely affect glycaemic control in non-obese Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus patients? A deplorable bona fide conscious clinical scenario!
|
| 15:01 |
A prospective study of the relevance of global vascular bed pathology in the pattern of management of vascular patients referred to a vascular tertiary referral centre. The clinical implications of presence of asymptomatic vascular pathology for outcome in peripheral arterial disease (PVD), abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and carotid (CAS) intervention.
|
| 15:05 |
Session 14: Disruptive Technologies & Innovative Solutions
More cutting edge technology and futuristic designs |
| 15:05 |
Medtronic
|
| 15:10 |
Gore Medical
|
| 15:15 |
Cordis
|
| 15:20 |
Boston Scientific
|
| Indigenous Companies | |
| 15:25 |
Endovenous Sub-adventitial stripping of the Great Saphenous Vein; The 21st Century graceful solution.
|
| 15:30 |
The Cosmopolitan Chameleon. A multi-dimensional device for the future
|
| What Do The Bioengineers Have In The Pipeline? | |
| 15:35 |
Development of Tissue Lined Stents
|
| 15:40 |
Modified Surfaces to Capture Endothelial Progenitor Cells for Venous applications
|
| 15:45 |
Where are we with percutaneous endovenous valve technology?
|
| 15:50 |
Coffee Break
|
| 16:15 |
Session 15: The Future Provision of Cardiovascular Therapies
A frank discussion on the training, service development, industry interaction and medico-legal issues |
| Innovation In The Management And Structure Of Vascular Services | |
| 16:15 |
Reconfiguration of vascular service. Is it a disaster or a luxury that we cannot afford?
|
| 16:20 |
Ten years late but still on track to declare our vascular independence
|
| 16:25 |
Variations in Vascular Training across the globe: Has anyone got it right?
|
| 16:30 |
Royal College of Surgeons of England views on Vascular Training
|
| Debate 1: | |
| 16:35 |
Has patient focused care gone too far and instilled a culture of "easy-suing"? Who cares for the carer?
|
| 16:40 |
Medico-legal systems are in place for the protection of the patient. If physicians provide quality care and abide by clinical standards they have nothing to fear
|
| 16:45 | -- Audience Vote -- |
| Bio-convergence: How Can We Bring All Parties On Board? | |
| 16:47 |
A successful future for Vascular Specialist extends beyond Device design. How can we manage our future and move forward as a sector. Bioconvergence
|
| 16:52 |
What role does the Smart hospital have to play in bioconvergence and how can we work with industry and science to speed up its implication?
|
| 16:57 |
How do we best serve the patient? Has our relationship with industry been mismanaged. How to work together to enhance standards of care without breaching ethics
|
| Breaking News | |
| 17:02 |
Endovascular treatment of chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency in the management of multiple sclerosis
|
| Key Note Speaker | |
| 17:12 |
A glimpse into the future from a visionary pioneer
|
| 17:25 |
Adjournment
|